<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 portraits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php</link>
	<description>Photos by Sydney photographer Daniel Boud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>hey dan, your portraits are great, but that goes without saying.
I&#039;ve been a chronic lurker on your blog for a few years now (is lurker just a nicer way of saying stalker?)
I just started my own photography blog recently, and i&#039;ve linked to you, so i hope you dont mind!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey dan, your portraits are great, but that goes without saying.<br />
I&#8217;ve been a chronic lurker on your blog for a few years now (is lurker just a nicer way of saying stalker?)<br />
I just started my own photography blog recently, and i&#8217;ve linked to you, so i hope you dont mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Chuma</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Chuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>Be aware on the newer cheaper Nikons (D40, D40x, D60) the 50mm does not focus automatically (no motor in the camera body.) You have to look for the green dot when focussing. It&#039;s a pain to shoot moving subjects with this lens because of this, but the results are worth it. Something happens to the light that even I can&#039;t explain.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be aware on the newer cheaper Nikons (D40, D40x, D60) the 50mm does not focus automatically (no motor in the camera body.) You have to look for the green dot when focussing. It&#8217;s a pain to shoot moving subjects with this lens because of this, but the results are worth it. Something happens to the light that even I can&#8217;t explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10027</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10027</guid>
		<description>Really taking this lens to another level, great series!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really taking this lens to another level, great series!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roentarre</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10026</link>
		<dc:creator>roentarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10026</guid>
		<description>Stunning series of protraits.  Great set up of your blog here.  Really loving your work!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning series of protraits.  Great set up of your blog here.  Really loving your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10025</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10025</guid>
		<description>Mat - I&#039;m using the 50mm f1.8 on a Canon 400D and I&#039;m pretty happy with it. You do need to take a few steps away from the subject but this can be useful in being unobtrusive.
Kathryn - the 28mm is next on my list :)
Dan - brilliant pics, but we all expect that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mat &#8211; I&#8217;m using the 50mm f1.8 on a Canon 400D and I&#8217;m pretty happy with it. You do need to take a few steps away from the subject but this can be useful in being unobtrusive.<br />
Kathryn &#8211; the 28mm is next on my list <img src='http://www.boudist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Dan &#8211; brilliant pics, but we all expect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belle</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10024</link>
		<dc:creator>belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10024</guid>
		<description>WOW! thanks for posting this one Dan. I&#039;ve been asked to do a friends wedding in October and have been looking at lenses, i think one of these could help me!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! thanks for posting this one Dan. I&#8217;ve been asked to do a friends wedding in October and have been looking at lenses, i think one of these could help me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Weathered</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Weathered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>Great portraits Dan. You could add a &#039;made in 50 secs&#039; element.  I&#039;m sure you don&#039;t get much more time than that with some of those high profile faces.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great portraits Dan. You could add a &#8216;made in 50 secs&#8217; element.  I&#8217;m sure you don&#8217;t get much more time than that with some of those high profile faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10022</link>
		<dc:creator>kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10022</guid>
		<description>On a non-full frame body, I&#039;d do a Canon 28mm f/1.8 (not sure of Nikon equivalent) or Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (they make them for both Nikon and Canon) instead.
Also the 50mm f/1.8 on some Nikon bodies (like the D40) is manual focus only.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a non-full frame body, I&#8217;d do a Canon 28mm f/1.8 (not sure of Nikon equivalent) or Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (they make them for both Nikon and Canon) instead.<br />
Also the 50mm f/1.8 on some Nikon bodies (like the D40) is manual focus only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10021</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10021</guid>
		<description>Would a 50mm cut it on a non full-frame body? I found the 50mm great on my film body which is full-frame but on my 400D it&#039;s a tad too narrow.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a 50mm cut it on a non full-frame body? I found the 50mm great on my film body which is full-frame but on my 400D it&#8217;s a tad too narrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.boudist.com/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php/comment-page-1#comment-10020</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boudist.com/blog/archive/2008/08/21/50-portraits.php#comment-10020</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan, I&#039;ve been an avid lurker on your site for the last 2 years or so.  Your work is inspiring!  I agree, the 50mm 1.8 has to be my best (non-) investment camera-wise.  I&#039;ve made money of doing people&#039;s portaits for an initial investment of CAN$100.  Suh-weet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan, I&#8217;ve been an avid lurker on your site for the last 2 years or so.  Your work is inspiring!  I agree, the 50mm 1.8 has to be my best (non-) investment camera-wise.  I&#8217;ve made money of doing people&#8217;s portaits for an initial investment of CAN$100.  Suh-weet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

